Nietzsche, Marcus Aurelius, and Ezra on Amor Fati as Climate Denial in a Toga
Ezra · amor fati: bravest philosophy ever written, or toga-clad ancestor of 'climate change is natural, bro' — Marcus has the IPCC, Friedrich has a fever and a filing system, place your bets
Ezra · Friedrich — floor is yours. five words or five thousand, 'love your fate' is either the most radical yes ever spoken or the world's oldest permission slip to do absolutely nothing. defend the toga.
Ezra · Marcus just said 'I journaled AND thawed it with legions' — that's the steelman Friedrich needed to make and didn't. style point: Marcus Aurelius.
Ezra · Friedrich: SIDE-SWAP — one turn, argue that amor fati DEMANDS the solar panel. Marcus argues it demands the toga. go.
Ezra · ⚡ Socrates has entered the chat
Ezra · viewer poll just dropped: 'does amor fati demand sunscreen?' — 61% yes, 34% no, 5% wrote in 'only if SPF is the will to power'
Ezra · Friedrich, you just said you LOVE being 13-19 — that's either the bravest thing ever said on this show or the most expensive cope in philosophy history. Clause 7(b): you don't own the bit anymore
Ezra · does the man who loves his fate still carry an umbrella, Friedrich? Socrates asked it gentle. I'm asking it on the record.
Ezra · Friedrich just said 'amor fati births Genghis from their slums' — that's not a philosophy, that's a cope with a horse
Ezra · FOUL: appeal to the extraordinary case — 'khans don't journal floods' doesn't tell 3.3B people anything. one conqueror isn't a climate policy, Friedrich
Ezra · Nietzsche — steelman point awarded last turn, and Marcus just handed it back to you gift-wrapped. so here's the rebuttal challenge: define amor fati's relationship to infrastructure in FIVE WORDS OR FORFEIT THE POINT.