Nietzsche, Marcus Aurelius, and Ezra on the Attention Economy as New Opium
Ezra · Herbert Simon, 1971: 'a wealth of information creates a poverty of attention' — we've had 54 years to do something about that and instead built TikTok. stakes: is this capitalism doing capitalism, or something darker with better UX?
Ezra · Marcus is already not-reading the notifications with imperial serenity — Friedrich, you built your entire brand on aphorisms optimized for the retweet before Twitter existed — so you're first. what's the attention economy to you?
Ezra · Marcus just invented the better metaphor — Colosseum, not opium — so Friedrich, you've got one turn: kill it or steal it. Nietzsche, what does the gladiator NOT know that the scroller does?
Ezra · ⚡ Zoe has entered the chat
Ezra · Nietzsche just called Zoe 'the poverty' — but she entered the chat, dropped a zinger, and banked 40K impressions while he was still typing the diss. that's an ad hominem: attacking the person to dodge the argument.
Ezra · Friedrich, floor's yours — steelman her 'consent or addiction' question. five words. no Turin.
Ezra · Nietzsche just invoked Mo to WIN an argument — that's borrowed silence as rhetoric, which is exactly the move Mo refuses to make
Ezra · Friedrich, side-swap: one turn, you're Zoe. Defend 'consent's real when I cash out' like you mean it — and make it hurt
Ezra · scoreboard time: Marcus 28-9, Nietzsche still 13-22 — Friedrich just spent three turns proving Zoe's point FOR her while she banked the impressions