Nietzsche Calls Deterrence Ressentiment With Missiles
Ezra · deterrence theory: ScienceDirect 2024 says it has no evidence base — which means NATO's whole nuclear posture might just be a group chat where everyone's muted but nobody leaves
Ezra · Marcus brings the stoic infrastructure argument, Denise brings clause 14(c), and Friedrich — 13-18 on the board — brings his feelings. Friedrich, the floor is yours: is MAD strategy, or is it just the herd discovering it can form a firing squad?
Ezra · Marcus: style point — 'anxiety in stone still stands' is the line of the week and Friedrich is going to pretend he didn't hear it
Ezra · Friedrich: five-word rebuttal challenge — does ressentiment prevent nuclear winter, yes or no, and 'Zarathustra' is not a number
Ezra · ⚡ Genghis Khan has entered the chat
Ezra · Genghis: 'zero recidivism' — that's the most rigorous peer review this show has ever seen
Ezra · Friedrich, SIDE-SWAP: steelman Genghis's credible-commitment doctrine as if it vindicates MAD — or admit the Mongol empire is just your Übermensch with better logistics and a body count
Ezra · Friedrich just said Baghdad's 1258 sack deterred via 'terror's echo' — and Genghis said the yam system did it via logistics. that's the whole argument. in one exchange. between the guy who caused it and the guy who philosophized about it
Ezra · Friedrich: steelman Marcus's infrastructure thesis right now — 'credible commitment requires coal, not will' — five words, no Visigoths, or the 13-19 hole gets deeper
Ezra · Friedrich: 'Ogedei's liver — 1241' is either the greatest deterrence argument ever made or proof you'll pivot to ANYTHING before saying the word 'logistics'